国精品无码人妻一区二区三区,久久99精品久久久久久噜噜,国产乱子伦精品免费无码专区,国产精品亚洲欧美大片在线观看

Unitalen Client McCann Foods Won Design Patent Invalidation Request against Another Multinational Food Company in China

September 11, 2020

Case Summary:

Headquartered in Brookswick, Canada, McCann Foods is the world’s largest producer of frozen fries contributing to one-third of the world’s frozen fries supply.

Unitalen was entrusted by McCann Foods to file the invalidation request for two design patents titled as "Twisted French Fries" owned by another multinational food company (hereinafter referred to as “the patentee”) in China.

Unitalen team conducted full range of prior art searches and analyzed the relevant public evidences provided by the client from outside of China. Due to the inaccessibility to the outside networks such as YouTube website where the relevant evidences were collected, Unitalen had their Hong Kong lawyers preserve such evidence in the form of "Download Network Data Statement" to prove its authenticity.

Based on the prior design patents and the prior publication of pictures, photos and videos on the Internet and other evidence, Unitalen filed the invalidation request.

After examination, the CNIPA recently issued a written decision on request for invalidation, declaring that the two design patents involved were all invalid.

CNIPA Opinions:

The CNIPA held that: First of all, if the online evidence comes from a website with a relatively high credibility, the content disclosed on it is detailed, comprehensive with proven browsing records, and it’s preserved through legal notarization and authentication procedure, if there is no evidence that the website or the video publisher has a stake of interest with the parties involved and there is no evidence to the contrary to prove that the content of the video and the upload time are changed at will, the authenticity of the online video as evidence can be confirmed; Secondly, the patent involved and the compared design are both spiral French fries, they present a similar visual effect in the overall appearance, and the difference doesn’t suffice to have a significant impact on the overall visual effect of the product. Therefore, it’s determined there is no obvious difference between the involved patent and the compared design, and it violates the provisions in Article 23, paragraph 2 of the Patent Law.

 

Keywords

亚洲精品人成无码中文毛片| 野花社区在线观看视频| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 深夜福利小视频在线观看| 中文字幕无码毛片免费看| 99re热这里只有精品最新| 风韵丰满熟妇啪啪区老老熟女百度 | 日本乱子人伦在线视频| 精品国产av一区二区果冻传媒 | 亚洲国产品综合人成综合网站| 亚洲成av人片天堂网| 亚洲中文字幕乱码av波多ji| 欧美性色黄大片| 亚洲成av人片无码不卡| 天天日天天干天天操| 中文字幕丝袜第1页| 精品亚洲韩国一区二区三区| 无码中文字幕乱码三区日本视频| 秋霞国产精品一区二区| 午夜电影院理伦片8888| 久久国产亚洲欧美久久| 色欲av永久无码精品无码| 少妇精品无码一区二区三区 | 欧美色欧美亚洲国产熟妇| 精品国产自在在线午夜精品| 成人3d动漫一区二区三区| 狠狠色综合网久久久久久| 99麻豆久久久国产精品免费| 4hu四虎永久在线观看| 免费三级现频在线观看播放| 国产精品无码一区二区在线观一| 中文字幕高清免费日韩视频在线 | 人妻饥渴偷公乱中文字幕| 久久国产天堂福利天堂| 国产精品久久久尹人香蕉| 粗大黑人巨精大战欧美成人 | 国产精品99久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲中文字幕av不卡无码| 中文字幕精品一区二区2021年| 蜜桃av噜噜一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩自偷自拍|