国精品无码人妻一区二区三区,久久99精品久久久久久噜噜,国产乱子伦精品免费无码专区,国产精品亚洲欧美大片在线观看

Unitalen Client ICON Won an Administrative Litigation Concerning Trademark Invalidation Involving Similar Products in Different Groups

February 25, 2021

Case Summary:

ICON is a world-renowned fitness equipment provider, and it owns a popular brand “iFit”, which is mainly used in smart training systems and smart wearable devices that support its fitness products.

“ifitfun”, the disputed trademark in this case, is registered by the third person, Mr. Cao, in Class 28 for "brainpower toys; balls for games; rehabilitation apparatus; beauty ware; pressure ware; body-training apparatus; machines for physical exercise; run-up ware; climber’s harness and plastic racetracks”. ICON company cited its trademarks “iFIT” and “IFIT”, which are registered prior and can be used in Class 28 for the products of “body-training apparatus” and “machines for physical exercises” etc., to apply for invalidation of the disputed trademark. After review, the Trademark Office held that the disputed trademark shall be declared invalid in use on the products that are in the similar groups as those of the cited trademarks, such as "body-building machines; rehabilitation apparatus; pressure ware”, however,the disputed trademark can be maintained in use on the rest of products, such as "smart toys; balls for games; sports equipment; run up ware; climber’s harness and plastic racetrack".

In disagreement with the above decision, ICON entrusted our law firm to file an administrative litigation vs the Trademark Office.

Court Ruling:

After hearing, the Beijing IP Court held that although the products approved for use by the disputed trademark and by the cited trademark are in different groups, they share certain overlap and strong relevance in terms of functional features, sales channels and consumer groups, etc., which constitutes the same or similar products. In addition, the third person’s act of registering the disputed trademark is not of subjectively goodwill, considering the publicity of the plaintiff and its products, and the distinctiveness of the cited trademark, which is easy for the relevant public to get confused or misidentify the source of the disputed trademark. Therefore, the disputed trademark constitutes similar trademark on the same or similar goods vs the cited trademark, violating Article 30 and Article 31 of the Trademark Law. It shall be declared invalid for use on all products. The decision made by the Trademark office shall be revoked and replaced by a new decision.

Typical Significance:

In trademark right determination review, the "International Classification of Goods and Services for Trademark Registration" and "Similar Goods and Services Classification Table" are usually used as references for judging similar goods or services. However, due to the continuous updating of goods and services, the judgment of similar goods or services will also be adjusted accordingly. In administrative cases involving trademark invalidation, case analysis should be carried out based on specific circumstances. This case combines the characteristics of the product itself, the subjective intention of the registrant of the disputed trademark, the actual use situation and the possibility of confusion and other consideration to provide a comprehensive view for judgment, which has provided a great reference for the handling of future similar cases.

 

Keywords

在线精品自偷自拍无码| 国产成人精品免费视频网页大全| 51久久国产露脸精品国产| 奇米影视色777四色在线首页| 国产日韩欧美亚洲精品中字| 国产色视频一区二区三区qq号| 米奇777超碰欧美日韩亚洲| 色欲久久久天天天综合网精品| 亚洲中文字幕高清有码在线 | 五月丁香久久综合网站| 国产精品免费大片| 超清精品丝袜国产自在线拍| 亚洲欧美日本中文字不卡| 99久久国产综合精麻豆| 国内精品视频自在一区| 97se亚洲综合在线| 成人看片黄a免费看那个网址| 色欲狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕| 色翁荡息又大又硬又粗视频| 大地资源网第二页免费观看| 久久中文字幕乱码久久午夜| 久久97超碰色中文字幕总站| 婷婷亚洲天堂影院| 秋霞在线观看秋| 少妇无码一区二区三区免费| 大学生高潮无套内谢视频| 国产三级韩国三级日产三级 | 久久成人伊人欧洲精品| 最新中文字幕av无码不卡| 伊人久久大香线蕉精品| 青草青草视频2免费观看| 国产精欧美一区二区三区| 久久久久青草线焦综合| 国产精品毛片一区二区| 亚洲精品成人久久av| 亚洲欧美综合中文| 亚洲男人天堂| 欧美老妇与zozoz0交| 又黄又猛又爽大片免费| 97人妻无码专区| 门国产乱子视频观看|